A Dissertation
Presented to the School of Foreign Studies
Anhui University
By
Zhao Ru
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of Master of Arts
Under the Supervision of
Professor Zhu Yue
Anhui University
Hefei
May, 2004
ContentsAcknowledgements
…………………………………………………….......ⅣAbstract (English)
……………………………………...……………….…ⅤAbstract (Chinese)
………………………………………………….……...ⅦPart 1 A Survey of Relevant Literature on Needs Analysis
1.1 A Survey of Needs Analysis and English Reading Teaching…….…1
1.2 A Survey of Needs Analysis Classifications……………………..…3
1.2.1 Target Needs……………………………………………………3
1.2.2 Learning Needs…………………………………………….…..5
1.3 A Survey of Methods for Needs Analysis……………………….….7
1.3.1 Gathering Information About Target Needs……………….…...8
1.3.2 Analyzing Learning Needs……………………………………..9
1.4 Summary………………………………………………………….
.10Part 2 Reading Needs Analysis of Students in JTVTC
2.1 The Planning Process………………………………………..……
.112.2 The Performance……………………………………...……….…..12
2.3 Students’ Reading Needs Analysis………………………….….….13
2.3.1 Do Students Have Strong Needs and Motivation
of Learning English?…………………………………….…...13
2.3.2 Who Decides the Success or Failure of English Study?…..….14
2.3.3 Grades of Entrance Examination……………………….…….14
2.3.4 Students’ Needs of Their Self-comments on English
Reading Teaching…………………………………………….16
2.3.5 Timed-reading: FREDA Tests……………………………..….18
2.3.6 Untimed-reading: Reading Tests of Grade A……………..…..20
2.3.7 Reading Requirements of the Syllabus……………………….21
2.4 Summary……………………………………………………….….22
Part 3 Reading Teaching on the Basis of Reading Needs Researches
3.1 Necessity of Reading Teaching……………………………………23
3.2 Purposes of Reading Teaching……………………………...……..23
3.3 What to be Taught?………………………………………………..24
3.4 How to Satisfy the Students’ Needs?…………………………..….26
3.4.1 Dealing with Long and Complex Sentences by Using
Grammar……………………………………………………....26
3.4.2 Dealing with Vocabulary………………………………………28
3.4.3 Improving Reading Speed………………………………..……30
3.4.4 Employing Reading Skills for Different Types of
Reading Materials…………………………………………..…31
3.4.5 Improving Comprehension Skills…………………….……...….35
3.5 Results of Reading Teaching on the Basis of Reading
Needs Research………………………………………………..…..42
3.5.1 Timed-reading……………………………………………....….42
3.5.2 Untimed-reading: Reading Test of Grade A…………….….….44
3.5.3 Final Examination……………………………………….....…..45
3.5.4 Students’ Self-comments on Reading………………….….…...45
3.6 Summary……………………………………………………….….48
Part 4 Conclusion..……………………………………………………..….49
Bibliographies…………………………………………………………..….51
Appendices……………………………………………………………...….53
Tables and Figures
Tables
Table 1 A Needs Analysis Using the CNP…………………………………..4
Table 2 Who Decides the Success or Failure of English Study……………13
Table 3 Motivation Test of English Study………………………………….14
Table 4 Grades of Entrance Examination…………………………………..15
Table 5 Students’ Self-comments on the Needs of English Reading
(Class 03115)…………………………………………………..…...16
Table 6 Students’ Grammatical Needs (Class 03115)……………….……...16
Table 7 Students’ Reading needs (Class 03115)……………………….…...17
Table 8 Students’ Vocabulary Needs (Class 03115)………………….…..…17
Table 9 Class Averages of Starting Reading Level (Class 03115)…...…..…18
Table 10 Class Averages of Starting Reading Level (Class 03114)…..….…19
Table 11 Reading Scores of Grade A Tests…………………………………21
Table 12 Class Averages of Ending Reading Level (Class 03115)……..…..42
Table 13 Final Summary: Averages for the Starting 5 Tests vs
the Ending 5 Tests (Class 03115)……………………………..…...42
Table 14 Class Averages of Ending Reading Level (Class 03114)….……...43
Table 15 Final Summary: Averages for the Starting 5 Tests vs
the Ending 5 Tests (Class 03114)…………………………..…..….43
Table 16 Reading Test of Grade A……………………………………....….44
Table 17 Grades of Final-examination…………………………………..….45
Table 18 Students’ Self-comments on Reading (Class 03115)……………..45
Table 19 Students’ Self-comments on Reading (Class 03114)……………..47
Figures
Figure 1 Class Averages of Starting Reading Level (Class 03115)………...19
Figure 2 Class Averages of Starting Reading Level (Class 03114)………...20
Figure 3 Class Averages of Ending Reading Level (Class 03115)…………42
Figure 4 Class Averages of Ending Reading Level (Class 03114)…………43
Acknowledgements
A great many friends, colleagues, students and teachers have helped me in many ways in the preparation of this paper---whether directly or indirectly. I am indebted to many people who provide me with information, advice, criticism and encouragement.
I would especially like to thank Professor Zhu Yue for his careful reading of, critical comments on and patient instruction to the final shape of this paper.
I would like to acknowledge the help and support of Professor Li Yongfang, who once provided me with her FREDA software generously.
I would also like to acknowledge many professors who taught me during the postgraduate study: they are professor Hua Quankun, professor Zhou Fangzhu, professor Li Yongfang, and professor Zhang Zhuwu.
I am grateful to Li Rui, Wen Haibo, Zhang Jinsong, Xu Gang, Wan Yichun, Chang Linbin, Li Fang, Chen Limin and Jiang Renfu for their assistance in solving technical problems of this paper.
Thanks go to Mr. Gary and his wife for their language correction.
Many thanks go to Professor Liu Junlie for his support and suggestion and to Qian Rangqing for supporting my postgraduate study.
I would also acknowledge the Foreign Language Department of Anhui University. It was through the use of her materials and interactions with a host of fine colleagues that this paper came into being.
Finally, I would like to thank fully my parents, who have encouraged and urged me to receive the best education possible, and to finish the postgraduate learning. In addition, I would like to thank my mother-in-law for her careful and gentle looking after my son during the writing of this paper, so that I can have a lot of time to read related books.
To all these people I offer my profound gratitude.
Abstract
This paper mainly discusses needs analysis and its application in English reading teaching.
The paper consists of four parts. Part 1 is a survey on needs analysis from three aspects. Part 2 chiefly introduces the researches on the students’ reading needs. Part 3 talks about the reading teaching based on the students’ needs analysis. Part 4 is a conclusion.
Through the surveys on needs analysis, the author finds out that although many researchers have done a lot of work on needs analysis, little is mentioned of its application to English reading teaching. The classifications are not very clear. The methods, introduced by researchers, are too complex and cannot easily be operated to learn the students’ needs on reading teaching.
In order to apply needs analysis to English reading teaching, the author designs some questions to collect the students’ needs for English reading. Questionnaires, tests, self-comments, etc. are also used. The students’ needs are analyzed, classified and compared with the requirements of the syllabus. According to the researches, the author notices that the students have various needs and their English reading level is low. So it is necessary to improve their reading ability. In order to evaluate the reading teaching based on the students’ needs analysis, Class 03115 and Class 03114 are chosen for experiment.
Class 03115 is taught on the basis of needs analysis, while Class 03114, as a control group, is not. After a term of training, another series of researches are made to find out how needs analysis influences English reading teaching. Final results show obviously that needs analysis really influences reading teaching. Class 03115 makes great progress in reading speed, comprehension rate, vocabulary, grammar, etc. The ending reading level is higher than the starting reading level. Unlike Class 03115, Class 03114 is not taught on the basis of students’ needs analysis and its teaching is carried out according to the syllabus. Although the students of Class 03114 have different needs, their needs are not paid much attention to during the reading teaching. Class 03114 makes little progress in each aspect of reading compared with Class 03115.
According to the surveys and the students’ reading needs researches, the reading teaching based on needs analysis is helpful to improve students’ reading ability. Students’ reading needs analysis affects English reading teaching. It plays an important role in the reading teaching. The students’ needs are satisfied basically and this kind of reading teaching is efficient.
However, the reading teaching researches are still to be made to further improve reading ability in the future. There are a lot of problems to be solved in needs analysis.
Key words: needs analysis, English reading teaching, syllabus,
reading needs
本文主要讨论了需求分析及其在英语阅读教学中的应用。
本文包括了四个部分,第一部分作者从三个方面对需求分析进行了调查,第二部分主要介绍了对学生阅读需求的调查,第三部分基于学生的需求分析进行的阅读教学,最后是论文的总结。
通过对需求分析的调查,作者发现尽管许多研究人员已对需求分析作了大量的研究工作,但几乎未涉及到其在英语阅读教学中的应用。对其分类的论述也不十分清楚。研究人员运用的调查方法太复杂,在阅读教学中用来了解学生的需求,不易操作。
为了把需求分析用于英语阅读教学,作者设计了一些问题用来调查学生英语阅读需求。同时本文还采用了问卷调查、测试、自我评论等方式。然后对学生的需求进行了分析、归类,并与教学大纲进行对比。通过调查,作者注意到学生的阅读需求各不相同,英语阅读水平也较低。因此有必要提高学生的阅读能力,为了研究学生的需求对阅读教学的影响,作者选择了
03115班和03114班作为实验班。03115
班运用需求分析进行教学,而03114班仅作为对照班。经过一个学期的教学试验,期末进行了又一系列的调查,以便弄清需求分析是怎样影响英语阅读教学的。最后的调查结果明显地表明03115班在阅读速度、理解率、词汇、语法等方面取得了很大的进步。试验后的阅读水平高于试验初的起始水平。与之相比,03114班根据大纲要求进行教学,而不是根据学生的需求进行。尽管学生对阅读的需求各不相同,但在教学中未给予这些需求足够的重视,03114班的学生在各方面的进步明显低于03115班的学生。通过对需求分析的调查和对学生的阅读需求的调查,根据需求分析的阅读教学有助于提高学生的阅读能力。学生的阅读需求分析影响了英语阅读教学,并在阅读教学中发挥了重要的作用。学生的需求基本上得到了满足,基于需求分析的阅读教学是有效的。
但是阅读教学调查仍需进一步的进行,以便将来进一步提高学生的阅读能力。并有许多问题仍待用需求分析来解决。
Part 1 A Survey of Relevant Literature on Needs Analysis
1.1 A Survey of Needs Analysis and English Reading Teaching
There are not many researches done on needs analysis. Munby (1978: 43, 78) holds that needs analysis is designed to make it possible to adjust language courses to the needs of groups of students working on various countries at different levels of proficiency and with a variety of objectives in mind.
Yalden (1983: 43, 166) believes that needs analysis remains an important first stage of curriculum development in many types of language teaching, serving as a key source of input for decisions to be made with respect to content, objectives, and treatment strategies.
Needs analysis is an essential step in the course design of modern English for Specific Purposes (ESP), and indeed it might seem crucial to ESP. The concept of needs analysis in fact developed within more general language teaching, within the developments of the Council of Europe (see Richterich and Chancerel, 1977).
Richards, Platt and Weber (1985), in their study of needs analysis, hold that needs analysis is to know and identify the language learners’ needs and the process of arranging the learning needs by its importance. That is to say, needs analysis is to learn why the learners study language, what language aspects they need to study and what degree they need to study, etc.
Tarone and Yule (2000: 31) indicate that needs analysis means investigating the language learner's needs. The term needs analysis once used in the context of language instruction, has usually referred to the collection and evaluation of information to answer the question: "What aspects of the language do learners need to know? " It is impossible, for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is lack of time, to teach all of any language. Needs analysis involves selections but not all the selections are particularly effective.
Probably, the most thorough and widely known work on needs analysis is Communicative Syllabus Design by John Munby (1982). Munby presents a highly detailed set of procedures for discovering target situation needs. He calls this set of procedures the Communication Needs Processor (CNP)(1982). The CNP consists of a range of questions about key communication variables (topic, participants, medium, etc.), which can be used to identify the target language needs of any group of learners. With the development of the CNP, it seems as if ESP had come of age. John Munby's work marks a watershed in the development of ESP. It provides a way to identify the needs of any group of learners. All the course designers have to do is to operate it. In fact the researches done by Richterich (1985), Chen Liping (2003) and Cheng Xiaotang (2002) are based on Munby’s set of procedures.
Chen Liping (2003: 148---173) mentions the important role of needs analysis in ESP, especially in the field of course design. The designers must collect and gather related information during the target needs analysis. In this book, Study of English for Special Purposes, she explains needs analysis from the points of target needs, learning needs and the application of needs analysis in the course design of English for Specific Purposes.
Cheng Xiaotang (2002: 35---50) also discusses needs analysis. In his book, Analysis and Design of English Teaching Materials, he mainly talks about this term from the point of analysis and design of teaching materials. In order to design teaching materials, the designers should know and recognize the learners’ needs and know what kind of information needs analysis can supply for the course design.
In short, Chen Liping (2003) and Cheng Xiaotang (2002) mainly discuss the application of needs analysis in course design.
Needs analysis has been studied by foreign language researchers for more than 20 years (see Masuhara, 1998: 239---260). But there are few researches or related materials about needs analysis in China.
There are no articles about needs analysis and English reading teaching in about 15 main magazines (appendix 1) in recent 3 years.
On the net site
www.google.com.cn, the author of this paper has searched the relevant articles, and 13700 items have been found. Of the 13700 items, only 9 items are related with needs analysis in relation to reading teaching. Some discuss needs analysis in relation to correspondence study, the course design, curriculum reading, the application in teaching and the graded teaching. These researches do not study needs analysis in relation to English reading teaching.From the survey above, the following conclusions can be made:
(1) Just as Tarone and Yule (2000: 31) have pointed out, the purpose of needs analysis is to investigate and identify the language learners’ needs. Therefore, in order to improve reading teaching, the teachers should make some researches about their students’ needs in English reading.
(2) In China, needs analysis is mainly discussed in course design. It is not explained in detail how needs analysis is applied in English reading teaching.
1.2 A Survey of Needs Analysis Classifications
Johnson and Porter (1983: 161) hold that an initial problem with needs analysis is the complexity of the categories for describing needs, which inevitably means that an analysis will be a lengthy affair. The needs of language learners are quite different. It is not easy to classify the needs. But without the classification, it is hard to explain the needs clearly and carry out needs analysis.
There are many kinds of needs. A number of people have discussed the different types or meanings of needs. Widdowson believes that needs can refer to learners’ study or job requirements, that is, what they have to be able to do at the end of their language course ( see Pauline Robinson, 1991: 7). Pauline Robinson (1991: 7) considers needs to be what the learners themselves would like to gain from the reading teaching. This view of needs implies that learners may have personal aims in addition to (or even in opposition to) the requirements of their studies. Berwick (1989: 55) notes that such personal needs may be (and often are) devalued by being viewed as “wants or desires”. And Pauline Robinson (1991: 8) also interprets needs as lacks, that is, what the learners do not know or cannot do in English.
The notion of “learner needs” remains somewhat ambiguous. Brindley (1989:76), for example, refers to a study in which three different teacher orientations to students’ needs are found: a general-language-proficiency view of needs, a psychological / humanistic view, emphasizing learners’ affective and strategic needs, and specific-purpose-view, emphasizing instrumental needs. Brindley emphasizes the importance in curriculum planning of reconciling, through information sharing what learners want and what teachers think the learners need.
The Munby's model has been widely studied and discussed. Munby's instruments directed at target needs, i.e. the needs that a learner will have when performing his specific work-tasks, at the end of the language course.
The following classification is by Tom Hutchinson and Alan Waters (1991: 53---63). First they make a basic distinction between target needs and learning needs. Then they make further division within the categories of target needs and learning needs.
1.2.1 Target Needs Target needs refer to what the learners need to do in target situation. A needs analysis, which focuses on the learners’ needs at the end of a language course, can be called a target situation. Target needs are something of an umbrella term (a general term), which in practice implies a number of important distinctions. It is more useful to look at the target situation in terms of necessities, lacks and wants:
(1) Necessities Necessities are determined by the demands of the target situation, that is, what the learners have to know in order to function effectively in the target situation. For example, a businessman might need to understand business letters, to communicate effectively at sales conferences, to get the necessary information from sales catalogues and so on. He will presumably also need to know the linguistic features. This information is relatively easy to gather, because it is a matter of observing what situations the learners will need to function in and a matter of analyzing the constituent parts of them.
The following example of this procedure is adapted from Munby (1982), and it shows the necessities for a learner who works as a headwaiter in a hotel.
Table 1 A Needs Analysis Using the CNP
Sample ‘Communication activities’ Related ‘micro-functions’ Language forms(productive)
7.1.1Attending to customers’arrival 7.1.1 1 intention I will bring the menu.
2 prohibit I'm afraid we are full/closed.
3 direct Please follow me/Will you sit
etc. here please?
7.1.2Attending to customers’order 7.1.2 1 suggestive May I suggest the ...(etc)
2 advice May I recommend the ...
3 describe You may find the ....
etc too hot/spicy(etc)
7.1.3Serving the order 7.1.3 question ...for you, sir/ madam?
_____________________________________etc The ...?________________
(2) Lacks To identify necessities alone is not enough. The teachers also need to know what the learners have known already, so that the teachers can then decide which of the necessities the learners lack. One target situation necessity might be to read texts in a particular subject area. Whether or not the learners need instruction in doing this will depend on how well they can do it already. The target proficiency, in other words, needs to be matched against the existing proficiency of the learners. The gap between the two can be referred to as the learners’ lacks.
(3) Wants Wants are what the learners themselves need to obtain. The learners have their own view about their needs. So far, the teachers have considered target needs only in an objective sense, with the actual learners playing no active role. But the learners, too, have a view as to what their needs are. As Richterich (1984: 29) comments: “...a need does not exist independent of a person. It is people who build their images of their needs on the basis of data relating to themselves and their environment”. Learners may well have a clear idea of the “necessities” of the target situation and they will certainly have a view as to their “lack”. But it is quite possible that the learners’ views will conflict with the perceptions of other interested parties: course designers, sponsors and teachers. Because there is no necessary relationship between necessities as perceived by the teachers and what the learners want or feel they need, the learners’ perceived wants could not be ignored.
Researches have shown that there is a gap between necessities, lacks and wants. What should the teachers do in such a situation? There can be no clear-cut answers. Each situation must be judged according to the particular circumstances. What is important is that the teachers should be aware of such differences and take them into account in using materials and methodology.
1.2.2 Learning Needs Learning needs refer to what the learners need to do in order to learn English. The question should be considered: “What knowledge and abilities will the learners require in order to be able to perform to the required degree of competence in the target situation?” What has been done so far is to consider the starting point (lacks) and the destination (necessities), although there might be some disputes as to what that destination should be (wants), and how to get from the starting point to the destination. This indicates another kind of need: learning needs.
Cheng Xiaotang (2002: 37) believes that such classifications of needs by Hutchinson and Waters (1991: 54---58) are clear and brief. They divide needs into target needs and learning needs. Each of them has sub-classifications.
But classifications of needs by Hutchinson and Waters are mainly used in English for Specific Purposes (ESP). Cheng Xiaotang (2002: 38) believes that their classifications of needs can also be used in general language teaching. The difference between ESP and General English lies in needs awareness of language learners, not in whether to meet the needs of the language learners. But the learners of General English have no clear ideas about their needs. The methods by Hutchinson and Waters are not suitable to know what kind or aspect of knowledge the learners of General English need to know.
Masuhara (1998: 239---260) summarizes the needs analysis and designs a new needs analysis framework, including the learners’ needs, the teachers’ needs and the administrators’ needs from different points of view. From his framework it can be realized that those three kinds of needs are not entirely the same. There is a gap between each other. The learners’ needs are not satisfied and taught by the teachers. The students do not appreciate the teachers’ needs. In addition, he mentions that the learners’ needs maybe do not really reflect the learners’ real needs. How to balance the three needs is still to be further studied.
Elain Tarone and George Yule (2000: 36---39) are of the opinion that needs analysis may be carried out---whether by a specialist or by a teacher---at any of four different levels: (1) the global level; (2) the rhetorical level; (3) the grammatical-rhetorical level, and (4) the grammatical level. Such analysis may focus upon the written or spoken language at all four levels.
The global level specifies the situations in which learners will need to use the language and the language-related activities required in those situations. At the global level, the basic question is, “What do these students need to use the language for?” The aim, then, is to describe those types of communicative situations in which the learners will use the language.
The rhetorical level relates to the organization of information in the discourse, which occurs within any given situation. Here one may ask “How is information organized in the written texts encountered by the learners in the situations identified at the global level?” Another sort of approach, which has recently been taken at the rhetorical level, requires an analysis of the organization of an interaction in terms of functions.
At the grammatical-rhetorical level, the goal of analysis is to determine what linguistic forms are used to realize the information structure established at the rhetorical level.
Finally, the grammatical level relates to the frequency with which grammatical forms are used in specific communicative situations. At this level, the teachers encounter a purely quantitative (as opposed to qualitative) form of analysis. Here the question is: “What is the frequency of the grammatical forms used by fluent speakers of the target language in the set of communication situations identified in the analysis at the global level?”
In short, Elain Tarone and George Yule (2003: 36---39) mainly examine in more detail the global and grammatical-rhetorical types of analysis, as these seem to be most useful to and operable by the teachers. But the teachers will find it less feasible to carry out analysis, for their investigations are too time-consuming.
R. Mackey (1978:21---37) in his Identifying the Nature of the Learner’ s Needs suggests practical ways of identifying learners’ needs through an interview or by means of a questionnaire. But his research form does not introduce reading needs or use needs analysis to direct reading teaching.
Judging by the learners’ primary interest, Mackey (1978: 28) believes that needs of the learners may be roughly divided into: academic needs, where English is required for further academic study, and job needs, where English is required in order to perform a particular practical job. The learners will have this need in future, but not now. The answers to needs will probably be different. In the starting stage of study, it is hard for the teachers to get the specific needs of the learners about reading because their needs are always changing.
From the above discussions, the conclusions can be drawn:
(1) Although there are various descriptions of needs, it is still not very clear which classifications are better. Just as what Johnson and Porter (1983: 161) have described, it is really complex to describe the categories of needs. There is not an agreed-upon way to divide needs. The teachers can classify and describe the needs according to their particular teaching situations.
(2) Different researchers explain needs analysis from different points of view. These explanations are not closely connected with reading teaching. But the researchers generally hold that needs analysis can gather language learners’ needs.
(3) There are a variety of classifications of needs analysis. No matter what kind of divisions, the purpose is to acknowledge learners’ needs in detail. Still, the classifications have no connection with reading teaching.
(4) Although there are different classifications of needs analysis, the teachers should also classify their learners’ needs, so that the teachers can have a clear idea of these needs.
1.3 A Survey of Methods for Needs Analysis
There are a number of ways in which information can be gathered about needs. The most frequently used ways are: questionnaires, interviews, observation and data collection, consultations with learners and others. Each of them has its advantages and disadvantages. They can support with each other. For the complexity of needs, it is desirable to use more than one of these methods. Just as Johnson and Porter point out (1983
:162), what is suitable for one group of students in one situation in one country preparing for one particular profession or course of study cannot be immediately usable (or usable at all) by another group in another country (or even in the same country). The practical circumstances are quite various. The choice will obviously depend on the time and resources available.It is also important to remember that needs analysis is not a once-for-all activity. It should be a continuing process, in which the conclusions drawn are constantly checked and re-assessed. Richterich and Chancerel (1980), and Holliday and Cooke (1983: 123---143) and others, also suggest that needs analysis needs to be repeated during the life of each course. As learners become more involved in the course, their attitudes and approach may change. The teachers or their sponsors may also become more ambitious and extend the targets towards which they are aiming. Knight (1981: 89---98) suggests that the identification of learner-related needs is a product of the developing course and the developing rapport between the teachers and the learners.
1.3.1Gathering Information About Target Needs
The analysis of target needs involves far more than simply identifying the linguistic features of the target situation.
The analysis of target situation needs is in essence a matter of asking questions about the target situation and the attitudes of the various learners towards that situation in the learning process. The simple framework below outlines the kind of information that the course designers need to gather from an analysis of target needs.
The following target situation analysis framework is chosen from Munby’s Communication Needs Processor (CNP)(1982).
Why is the language needed?
---for study ---for a combination of these
---for work ---for some other purpose, e.g. status examination,
promotion
---for training
Where will the language be used?
---physical setting: e.g. office, lecture theatre, hotel, workshop, library
---human context: e.g. alone, meetings, demonstrations, on telephone
---linguistic context: e.g. in own country, abroad
How will the language be used?
--- medium: speaking, wring, reading, etc.
---channel: e.g. telephone, face to face
---types of text or discourse: e.g. academic texts, lectures, informal
conversations, technical manuals, catalogues.
When will the language be used?
---frequently, seldom, in small amounts, in large chunks
Munby’s analysis framework is too complex and is not easy to carry out. And it seems that by using this way, the teachers cannot get the real reading needs of the learners. It is clear that interpretations of needs can vary according to the point of view of a particular learner. In analyzing the learners’ needs, it would be a normal practice to ask the teachers and the learners about their English needs. The teachers have a personal impression that the level of English needed is high. The learners, on the other hand, may give a much lower indication of the need for English, because they know (or would prefer to believe) that it is not really necessary, and they might consider their interests to lie in English for their future employment, for social purposes or even in not having English at all. It is obviously necessary to obtain answers to the questions from a variety of sources, and to try to negotiate (delicately) a satisfactory compromise.
1.3.2 Analyzing Learning Needs
To analyze learning needs, a checklist similar to that used for target situation analysis is used.
The following framework for analyzing learning needs is chosen from Munby's CNP (1982).
Why are the learners taking the course?
---compulsory or optional;
---apparent need or not;
---Are status, money, promotion involved?
---What do learners think they will achieve?
---What is their attitude towards the ESP course? Do they want to improve their English or do they resent the time they have to spend on it?
How do the learners learn?
---What is their learning background?
---What is their concept of teaching and learning?
---What methodology will appeal to them?
---What sort of techniques are likely to bore / alienate them?
What resources are available?
---number and professional competence of teachers;
---attitude of teachers to ESP;
---teachers’ knowledge of and attitude to the subject content;
---materials;
---aids;
---opportunities for out-of-class activities.
Who are the learners?
---age / sex / nationality;
---What do they know already about English?
---What subject knowledge do they have?
---What are their interests?
---What is their socio-cultural background?
---what teaching styles are they used to ?
---What is their attitude to English or to the cultures of the English-speaking world?
Where will the ESP course take place?
---Are the surroundings pleasant, dull, noisy, cold, etc?
When will the ESP course take place?
---time of day;
---every day / once a week;
---full-time / part-time;
---concurrent with need of pre-need.
Although some needs of learners can be gathered in this way, there is no such a standard formula for the teachers to learn about their learners’ needs.
Although Munby’s research on needs analysis is the most thorough and widely known, his methods to collect needs of learners are too complex and there is also no further discussion about the connection between needs analysis and English reading teaching. It is not suitable for the teachers to follow his methods and collect their students’ needs in English reading.
It is impossible to realize needs analysis fully. First, the valid tools of analysis are complex and time-consuming to administer. Second, the needs of learners tend to be so diverse that a genuine application of the results of a needs analysis proves not feasible. What the teachers need for needs analysis is a system which is workable, practical and simple. The methods mentioned above are complex and confusing.
1.4 Summary
(1) The works of many researchers mentioned above give the general idea of needs analysis and research methods and instruments, which are helpful to collect the learners' reading needs.
(2) The classifications and the research methods of needs analysis are sometimes not convenient for the teachers to carry out. The questions, which are used to collect the needs, are not related with reading teaching.
(3) In recent years, not many articles about needs analysis of reading teaching have appeared in several current main periodicals in China. That is to say, there are few researches done on how reading teaching should be taught on the basis of learners' needs analysis.
(4) Although some researches on needs analysis have been done, they are mainly done in other fields than in the field of English reading teaching. The English level of the learners is not very clear, even if some researches have been done on specific persons, or students.
(5) To some degree, the teachers just use the term of needs analysis or some of the tools and instruments to obtain the learners' needs. If the teachers want to improve the reading teaching, they have to design the questions which are closely or fully connected with reading teaching to collect information and to restrict the range of needs research to the field of reading teaching. When the needs are clear, teaching aims can be defined. The teachers then can translate these needs into linguistic and pedagogic terms in order to teach a course effectively. The collected information can direct the future reading teaching.
This paper borrows the term needs analysis and adopts it in the field of English reading teaching in Jiao Tong Vocational and Technical College (JTVTC). The purpose of this paper is to find out how the English reading teaching is performed and influenced on the basis of students’ needs for reading. In order to carry out needs analysis, the author makes a series of researches. Some methods are used to collect the students’ needs, such as questionnaires, tests, interviews, students’ self-comments, etc. The author chooses two classes (Class 03115 and Class 03114) as reference to compare the final teaching efficiency. By needs analysis, the author tries to identify the students’ needs for reading. The students’ needs are analyzed and classified. By comparing the students’ needs with the requirements of the syllabus, the author decides what should be taught in the reading teaching and how to teach English reading. In order to evaluate how the students’ needs for reading affect the reading teaching, the author has also made another series of researches after a term of teaching based on the students’ needs analysis. This kind of teaching will direct the author’s future reading teaching.
Part 2 Reading Needs Analysis of Students in JTVTC
2.1 The Planning Process
In order to study students' needs, the author makes some preparations to collect related needs questionnaires, to analyze the researches done by some experts and to design the procedures which are workable in the needs research.
2.2 The Performance
The following is the author's researches on needs analysis of the students in English reading teaching.
(1) Questions:
Do the students have strong needs and motivation of learning
English?
(b) What problems do they have in English reading?
(c) What are their present and starting reading levels?
(d) Are the students’ needs coincident with the syllabus?
(2) Objectives:
(a) to find the students’ real needs in English reading
(b) to determine what would be taught according to the needs research and needs analysis
(c) to instruct reading teaching
(3) Subjects:
The subjects are students enrolled in the spring semester of 2003. The teachers and the students are in the same college in Jiao Tong Vocational and Technical College. The same teacher teaches them English reading during the research period.
(4) Time:
Researches are carried out during the first two weeks of the first semester in October, 2003.
(5) Tools and instruments for reading needs research:
The author mainly uses subjective methods, objective methods and self-comments on needs to identify what the students are eager or anxious to learn and what they need to learn. The author consults materials, collects the related questionnaires and designs the research procedures and some questions to carry out needs analysis. The detailed interviews and participating observations are used for investigating needs. The following collection instruments are used in the author's researches.
?(appendix 2)(a)Wen Qiufang (2003:240---241): Who decides the success or failure of English study
(b)Wen Qiufang (2003:255---257): English study motivation (appendix 3)
(c) the grades of entrance examination
(d) the starting level of English reading
(1)timed-reading: LiYongfang’s FREDA software (1994: 64---66) (2)untimed-reading: tests of Grade A
(d) the students’ self-comments on the English reading problem
(e) the syllabus
(6) data:
All the data depend on reading tests and students’ self-comments, a few interviews, discussions, observations, etc.
2.3 Students’ Reading Needs Analysis
2.3.1 Do Students Have Strong Needs and Motivation of Learning English?
This question seems to have no relationship with needs analysis and reading teaching. The author just wants to show that motivation is one of the emotional factors influencing English study. It plays an important role in learning English well. The purpose of this research is to find out whether the students have strong desire to study English. That is to say, if the students are willing to study English, then they have strong desire to study English. The future research is conducted under the same prerequisite that the students would like to study.
Table 2 Motivation Test of English Study
|
Numbers |
||
|
Class03115 |
03114 |
Motivation |
|
24 1 13 1 |
21 2 14 2 |
deep motivation surface motivation both of them absent |
According to educational theory, learning motivation is subdivided into deep motivation and surface motivation (see Wen Qiufang, 2000:174). The students with deep motivation can be active and try to learn English better. However, the students with surface motivation lack activity and initiation. That is to say, the former motivation (deep motivation) is that “ I want to learn”, while the latter (surface motivation) is that “ I am required to learn”.
Table 2 indicates that a majority of the students have motivation of studying English. More students want to study English. Only few students study English passively. The students with both deep motivation and surface motivation study English just because many different factors influence them. These students’ future English study can last longer than that of students with only one single motivation.
But no motivation means having serious problems. At least, the students should have one motivation. Having one motivation would be better than having no motivation.
2.3.2 Who Decides the Success or Failure of English Study?
Table3 Who Decides the Success or Failure of English Study?
|
Believe in oneself |
Do not believe in oneself |
Not clear |
Absent |
||
|
Numbers |
Class 03115 Class 03114 |
36 34 |
0 0 |
2 3 |
1 2 |
From this table, most students believe that self-effort is very crucial in English study. It is the students themselves who decide their success or failure. Only when they realize the importance of themselves could they try their best to find their problems in English study, and think over the reasons of making great or little progress. And then they can manage and control or monitor their learning behavior. If they study hard, maybe they can make progress. This belief is the source and foundation of learning English well and actively in the future. If they do not realize their role in study, they need to think over what causes the success or failure of study. This table shows there is not much difference about who decides the success or failure of English study in the two classes.
Both Tables 2 and 3 indicate that more than 80% of the students are active in English study. Most of them have strong desire and wish to study English. This lays good foundation for further English reading teaching, especially the teaching of reading skills. They would like to receive new knowledge and would like to finish new tasks.
2.3.3 Grades of Entrance Examination
The following table is the student’s English grades of entrance examination in 2003.
Table 4 English Grades of Entrance Examination
Names English grades(150%) grades(100%) Names English grades(150%) grades(100%)
1 Li Xiang 90 54 1 Xu Xu 92 55.2
2 Wang Yonghua 90 54 2 Tian Lingmin 89 53.4
3 Niu Ling 87 52.2 3 Chao Jin 88 52.8
4 Zhao Jie 86 51.6 4 Ge Beibei 87 52.2
5 Cheng Xiaoyuan 85 51 5 Wu Li
87 52.26 Li Xiuyun 85 51
6 Xu Haiyan 86 51.67 Zhang Yan 84 50.4 7 Tao Chengpeng
86 51.68 Ke Xiuli 84 50.4 8 Wang Huan
86 51.69 Peng Juan 83 49.8 9 Qin Hualin
85 5110 Shen Chaoyi 83 49.8 10 Sun Feilong
84 50.411 Meng Weizheng 82 49.2 11 Huang Huan
81 48.612 Yan Qiqiang 81 48.6 12 Wei Pingbo
81 48.613 Zhu Mengya 80 48 13 Chen Kui
80 4814 Xu Shaoxia 79 47.4 14 Chen Wei
80 4815 Hu Zhoufang 78 46.8 15 Zuo Zongxiang
80 4816 Du Ting 77 46.2 16 Wang Rui
78 46.817 Cheng Ying 76 45.6 17 Liu Yuhu
77 46.218 Guo Jun 74 44.4 18 Wang Guan
76 45.619 Ding Qin 73 43.8 19 Ma Fei
75 4520 Li Xia 73 43.8 20 Fan Yuanchao
75 4521 Yao Yao 72 43.2 21 Han Honglei
73 43.822 Kong Fanli 70 42 22 Sheng Xinglei
72 43.223 Mei Lina 70 42 23 Lin Ruxing
71 42.624 Lu Hong 70 42 24 Guo Mengxing
71 42.625 Chu Yanan 70 42 25 He Chuanjiang
71 42.626 Qu Cheng 70 42 26 Shi Kunpeng
70 4227 Qian Hanmei 67 40.2 27 Tang Tao
70 4228 Li Bingyun 67 40.2 28 Cheng Xinyi
66 39.629 Du Xiaoli 66 39.6 29 Yin Yuanyuan
65 3930 Yang Jin 65 39 30 Zhang Heng
65 3931 Wang Xiaoli 64 38.4 31Wang Yibo
64 38.432 Yao Min 64 38.4 32 Yao Fangwei
63 37.833 Tian Tian 63 37.8 33 Hu Guanye
60 3634 He Zhijie 56 33.6 34 Xu Gang
58 34.835 Shen Xiaoyao 55 33 35 Kong Haifeng
54 32.436 Yu Chenghui 54 32.4 36 Xu Silu
52 31.237 Pan Fangfang 51 30.6 37 Guo Rongxing 51 30.6
38 Huan Binyan 42 25.2 38 Jiang Chuanqiong
42 25.239 Ma Yuanyuan 32 19.2 39 Lu Junyu
40 24____average scores 73.8 44.3 average scores 72.5 43.5
___This table shows clearly that the students’ English grades vary from 54 to 19.2. The difference or the gap of English level is great. How to teach them and improve their English in the same class is a hard job for the author. It proves necessary to learn the students’ different needs before and during the reading teaching. Then the author can satisfy the students’ needs and improve reading teaching efficiency.
2.3.4 Students' Needs by Their Self-comments on English Reading Teaching
The students are asked to write their self-comments on reading after class so they have enough time to think about their real reading needs.
Table 5
Students' Self-comments on the Needs of English Reading (Class 03115)|
Questions |
Times |
|
Reading |
27 |
|
Vocabulary |
48 |
|
Grammar |
12 |
|
Strong learning motivation and interest |
4 |
|
Deepening study and Enlarging knowledge |
2 |
|
Absent |
2 |
Although the students are required to write what problems they have in
English reading, the students also point out their needs for the teachers. Some students have no clear needs for English reading. The author mainly discusses the needs connected with English reading. From Table 5, it is noticed that the students are eager to solve their reading and vocabulary problems. Only 12 students talk about grammar needs. But the students have concrete and different needs for reading, vocabulary and grammar.
Students’ Concrete Needs for English Reading (Class 03115)
Table 6
|
Times |
Grammatical Needs |
|
3
8 1 2 |
Ask to explain grammar while the teacher explains the text
Ask to explain much more grammar separately Not clear about the grammatical structure Cannot distinguish different tenses and often feel confused about these tenses |
Table 7
|
Times |
Reading Needs |
|
1 8 5 3 2 5 1 1 3 10 8 |
Feel nervous during the reading exercise Not know what the text discusses or the main idea of the text Unable to find the correct answers to the questions after the text
Ask to introduce reading skills Want to improve reading speed Read back frequently Misunderstand meaning of the new words in the context Want to improve reading comprehension Usually read purposelessly Confused by some long and complex sentences |
Table 8
|
Times |
Vocabulary Needs |
|
1 5 1 2 3 10 3 1 1 |
Easily forget the new words and expressions Impatient to study and be afraid of difficulty Ask to explain the collation of vocabulary and write them on the blackboard Ask to explain pronunciation and the meaning of vocabulary Cannot remember corresponding Chinese of vocabulary
Ask to introduce how to remember vocabulary
Looking up vocabulary in the dictionary influences reading speed.
|
All in all, the students have different needs for English reading. They can realize their needs but do not know how to satisfy them. Some students just want to solve one or several problems of reading.
What the students are worried about is how to improve their reading ability. This problem is reflected in their vocabulary, reading speed and comprehension rate.
They have not realized the importance of reading skills and how to improve the reading. But they have certain needs. They can point out their problems and want to know how to solve these problems.
The needs that the students point out are not unanimously the same as the requirements of the syllabus. The syllabus requires that the students improve their reading ability.
These problems affect reading teaching. If they are not solved, the reading teaching is hard to improve quickly.
The author may say that the students have little theory about English reading, so that they cannot apply the theory to their problems. The teachers should teach and explain reading systematically.
In the same way, the students of Class 03114 have the same needs. They are eager to improve reading speed, comprehension rate and to enlarge vocabulary. Some students are also keen to review grammar.
2.3.5 Timed-reading: FREDA Tests
(1) Objectives: The purpose of timed-reading tests is to identify the starting and ending levels of English reading, to direct and improve the reading teaching and to find out the average reading speed and comprehension rate of the students.
(2) Test materials: Ten texts are chosen from Practical English Book, which is equal to the level of Grade A carried out in vocational colleges by the Educational Department. Each text, with a few new words, is nonprofessional and has five questions. Some new words have Chinese explanations or meanings of some words can be understood from the context.
(3) Test method: timed reading. The reading time is less than ten minutes each time, including reading the text and answering the questions.
(4) Test time: the first two weeks (5 times) after the new term and the last two weeks (5 times) at the end of the same term in September and December, 2003.
(5) Procedures: The author writes the time (minutes and seconds) on the blackboard before the class, and then hands out the materials after the bell rings. The author points time according to the watch. After the students finish reading the passage, they are asked to write down the time of reading text time and the whole time of finishing the text. The students can see the time on the blackboard. They are not allowed them to look up the new words in the dictionary during the reading. At last the author collects the answer sheets and obtains the results each time.
(6) Data collection: The teacher inputs the data into the computer and the data are processed by FREDA.
Table 9 Class Averages of Starting Reading Level (Class 03115)
Attn.Times 4.512 Reading Efficiency: 70ew/m
Reading Speed:(w/m) Pass:105w/m Good:140w/m Excel:175w/m
|
Text RdSpd CRate Effi ExSpd Level No. (w/m) (%) (ew/m) (s/q) |
|
Avg. 76.6 72 55.8 36 Fail |
|
1 73 68.9 51 32.9
5 87 71.2 62 34.0 |
Notes: RdSpd---reading speed Crate---comprehension rate
Effi---efficiency ExSpd---exercise speed
w/m---word per minute ew/m---efficient word per minute
s/q---speed per question Attn.Times---attendent times
Figure 1 Class Averages of Starting Reading Level (Class 03115)
According to Table 9, the reading speed (76.6w/m) is far below the criteria (Pass: 105w/m). The reading efficiency (55.8ew/m) is also below the criteria (70ew/m). No one reaches the required standards. The starting level is Fail. This level is far below what is required about reading by the syllabus. It is necessary for the author to improve the reading teaching. Figure 1 shows clearly the starting reading level. Reading speed and efficiency are under the standard lines.
Table 10 Class Averages of Starting Reading Level (Class 03114)
Attn.Times 4.671 Reading Efficiency: 70ew/m
Reading Speed: (w/m) Pass:105w/m Good:140w/m Excel:175w/m
|
Text RdSpd CRate Effi ExSpd Level No. (w/m) (%) (ew/m) (s/q) |
|
Avg. 76.6 71.2 55.4 36 Fail |
|
1 72 68.2 50 34
5 86 75.0 64 33 |
Figure 2 Class Averages of Starting Reading Level (Class 03114)
From the above Tables 9 and 10, the starting reading levels of Class 03115 are similar to that of Class 03114. The gap of comprehension rate is only 0.8 percent. The gap of reading efficiency is 0.4 ew/m. Reading speed and exercise speed are the same. Figures 1 and 2 also show that the reading levels of two classes develop in the same direction. So the starting reading levels of the two classes are almost the same with little difference in reading ability.
2.3.6 Untimed-reading: Reading Tests of Grade A
In the first two weeks of the new term on October, 2003, the students
are required to finish four passages with five questions each time. The passages are chosen from Test Bank produced by the Department of Higher Education. The level is similar to that of Grade A. Without time limitation, they cannot look up the unknown words in the dictionary. After finishing the exercises, the students hand in their answer sheets to the author. The author checks the answers and calculates the results. The following table is the results. Both classes have 39 students.
Table 11 Reading Scores of Grade A Tests
|
Test No. |
Questions |
Full Scores |
Average Scores |
|
|
Class 03115 |
Class 03114 |
|||
|
23 18 17.5 17 21.5 |
24 17.5 17.9 17.5 20.5 |
|||
|
average |
20 |
40 |
19.4 |
19.5 |
According to this table, the students almost have the same starting reading level. If 40 scores are equal to 100 scores, then 24 scores are equal to the pass score (60 scores). Up to now, the student’s average score is about 19 scores. The students have not got the pass score (24 scores). So the comprehension rate by Grade A tests is quite low and needs to be improved.
2.3.7 Reading Requirements of the Syllabus (2000: 2-6)
The syllabus directs the teaching and states what the students should know or will have known by the end of the course. The teachers should be instructed by the syllabus in their teaching. But a syllabus only constitutes an approximate statement of what will be taught. The syllabus for non-English major in vocational colleges requires:
Grade A: The students should be able to read mid-level short English materials of general subjects and understand them correctly. The reading speed of material with less than 3% of unknown words should not be less than 70w/p.m. The students should be able to understand the short general and practical material such as letters, contract, etc. The understanding is correct.
Grade B: The students should be able to read mid-level short English materials of general subjects and understand them correctly. The reading speed of material with less than 3% of unknown words should not be less than 50w/p.m. The students should be able to understand the short general and practical material such as letters, contract, etc. The understanding is basically correct.
The syllabus only lists the final reading goals and gives a general list of language skills, without consideration of the students’ needs, such as:
---to understand the main idea of the passage
---to understand the concrete information
---to guess the meaning of the new words by reference according to the context
---to make a simple judgment and reference according to the context
---to identify the writer’s writing purpose, viewpoint and attitude
---to make a conclusion to the reading material
---to scan related information quickly
From the list, there are some similar needs between the syllabus and the students. The syllabus reflects parts of the students’ needs. But there are some syllabus needs that the students do not mention, and these needs are difficult for the students to meet at the beginning of study.
As to what to teach in practical teaching, the syllabus stipulates the teaching contents and aims objectively. In fact, the teaching should meet the needs of the syllabus and the needs of the students at the same time. To satisfy the needs of the students and of the syllabus, the teachers themselves can use any kinds of teaching methods and materials.
According to the reading needs researches and the requirements of the syllabus, what is planned in the syllabus and what actually happens in teaching are two different things.
2.4 Summary
According to the above investigation, the author comes to the following conclusions.
(1) The students believe that the students themselves are the most important factor in the success or failure in English study. They have strong motivation of improving reading and learning English. This lays a basis for the future teaching because they would like to study English.
(2) They have the strong needs to improve reading, but they do not have special or particular needs for their major. The students have clear reading needs and they only want to solve the problems they have come across in vocabulary, grammar, reading, etc.
(3) The timed-reading and untimed-reading test results show that it is a fact that the starting reading level is not high
. There are quite a lot of reasons. The grades of entrance examination prove that their present staring English level is really low. Maybe they have not received any reading training systematically. It is necessary for the author to help the students improve reading comprehension.(4) The syllabus requires the students to improve reading and clearly states the reading requirements. However, the students have their own problems and difficulties in reading. Both the syllabus and the students show the needs of improving reading. The two kinds of needs are coincident with each other, therefore the author can satisfy their needs simultaneously.
Part 3 Reading Teaching on the Basis of Reading Needs Researches
3.1 Necessity of Reading Teaching
From the reading needs research and the requirements of the syllabus, the students’ reading level is quite low and the syllabus has clear demands for reading. It is necessary to improve the students’ reading. The most important of all, the students are keen to improve their reading ability at the moment. What is more, reading is an important way to acquire new language information and to perfect the students’ English. And the teachers have the responsibility of teaching the students to read efficiently.
3.2 Purposes of Reading Teaching
The students read not only to get information, but also to learn new language knowledge. There are different reading purposes. Williams (see Jo McDonough and Shaw, 1996: 102 ) usefully classifies reading into:
(1) getting general information from the text
(2) getting specific information from a text
(3) for pleasure or for interest .
Rivers and Temperley (see JoMcDonough and Shaw, 1996:187) list some reasons that the students may need or want to read.
(1) to get information for some purpose or because the reader is curious about some topic.
(2) to obtain instructions on how to perform some task for the work or daily life.
(3) to keep in touch with friends by correspondence or to understand business letters.
(4) to know when or where something will take place or what is available
(5) to know what is happening or has happened (as reported in newspapers, magazines, reports)
(6) for enjoyment or excitement
In addition to the purposes above, the purpose of the author’s reading teaching is to satisfy needs of the students and the requirements of the syllabus. Generally speaking, the teachers would consider all the situations of the students, however, it is impossible for the teachers to meet the needs of all the students. Only the needs of the majority of students are to be met. The special needs of the students would be treated in a special way during class or after class.
Gerry Abbott and Peter Wingard (1990:83) point out efficient reading depends on having a purpose for reading, knowing why the students are reading a text. The purpose will usually determine the appropriate type of reading and the relevant reading skills to be used. The students should know the purpose for their reading before they actually read. However simple and obvious this may seem, it rarely happens. The students’ reading is usually purposeless and they often read everything in the same way and at the same speed. So it is important to have a clear purpose during reading teaching.
3.3 What to be Taught?
Language is a complex entity. It cannot be learnt and taught in one step. The author can break down the complex into manageable units. Even so, the author cannot decide what should be taught, or what should be excluded. The author has to follow the syllabus, but the syllabus only provides a set of criteria for reading. So the author should take the needs of students and the requirements of syllabus into consideration at the same time. There are the same demands between the students’ needs and the requirements of the syllabus. The author can begin teaching with these common parts.
Vocabulary is a big obstacle for the students to improve reading. It must be solved during reading teaching. Common parts about reading comprehension can be found between the students' needs and the requirements of the syllabus, such as:
---to improve reading speed
---to guess the meaning of unknown words correctly
---to know the main idea of the reading materials
---to understand the reading material correctly
Almost all the students’ needs, which are reflected in their self-comments, are the basic requirements of the syllabus.
There are some parts which are not mentioned in the students’ needs, but are required in the syllabus, such as understanding specific information, making a simple judgment or reference, recognizing the writer’s purpose, attitude and tone, making conclusion about the reading materials.
Why these parts are not mentioned in the students’ self-comments is that the students point out their basic needs which are eager to be satisfied. The real reasons are still to be studied. While taking the students’ needs and the requirements of the syllabus into considerations, the author also refers to a lot of other researches about reading.
Many reading experts believe that reading competence is composed of various kinds and different levels of small competence. The teaching and testing of reading competence in fact are just taught and tested through the small and various competences. Zou Shen provides the following summary on reading comprehension (1999: 26---27).
The latest division of reading competence by Weir in 1993 consists of A, B, and C levels.
A: Fast reading for scanning specific information, the outline, etc.
B: Understanding the main idea and the important details, the implied meaning
C: Grasping the language skills (understand grammar conception, syntax structure, signal words, the word meaning, etc.)
A and B are higher levels of small competence. C is a lower level of small competence.
Davis in 1944 and 1968 divided into small reading competence into 4 kinds:
(1) Identify meanings of words
(2) Acquire implied meanings
(3) Identify writing skills and the attitudes of a text
(4) Find the answers to the questions
Wen Qiufang (2003: 66) thinks that reading comprehension can be divided into three levels from low to high: (1) literal comprehension; (2) inferential comprehension and (3) critical comprehension.
Literal comprehension just understands the ideas and facts that are directly stated. It is fundamental to all reading skills at any level because the students must first understand what the writer has actually written before the students draw an inference or make an evaluation. The literal level is considered the easiest level of reading comprehension; therefore, less thinking is involved.
Inferential comprehension requires the students to “read between the lines”. Inferences are ideas that are received beneath the surface to sense relationships, put facts and ideas together to draw conclusions and make generalizations, and detect the mood and tone of the material. Making inferences requires more thinking on the students’ insight.
Critical comprehension requires an even higher degree of skill development and perception. It is the students’ comment on the material. To read critically does not mean merely looking for false statements; rather it means questioning, comparing and evaluating.
Three kinds of comprehension are connected with each other. The lower level is the basis of the higher level. The higher level of comprehension includes the lower level of comprehension.
No matter what kind of classification, their concrete demands for reading are similar to the students' needs and the requirements of the syllabus.
So what should be taught in the reading teaching? First, the students' needs should be satisfied. That is to say, the author solves their concerned problems about reading. Second, although some parts of reading are not required by the students, these parts are requested clearly in the syllabus and should be taught in reading teaching. Third, some skills, which could be helpful to improving reading ability, should also be taught. Fourth, some basic skills should be taught first because they are easy for the students to understand and apply to their reading.
3.4. How to Satisfy the Students’ Needs?
3.4.1 Dealing with Long and Complex Sentences by Using Grammar
The students point out that long and complex sentences influence their understanding of a text. Sometimes they do not know how to cope with these sentences and cannot apply grammatical knowledge to analyzing these sentences. There are different reasons that make some sentences difficult for the students to understand. As to this kind of problems, the author can choose some representative sentences from the reading materials, and ask the students to analyze the sentences. In analyzing the sentences, the students can review the grammar. If the students are asked to read the grammar books after class, they feel bored and would not like to read, even if they are eager to improve their grammar knowledge.
The following sentences are chosen from Extensive Reading for Business English:
(1) There are few places left that are in the state they were in before the Europeans arrived.
(2) Customers will not purchase a product or service until they are combined that they will benefit from owning that product or service.
(3) He was aware that there were a number of people who claimed to know a great deal about antiques, and even more people who would rather not admit that they did not and who accordingly practiced little tricks to conceal their ignorance or impress their neighbors.
(4) The women---they were mainly women---jostling around his stall, picking over his shoddy wares, would sometimes run a finger round the rim of a cup or hold it knowingly up to the light as if to test its luster, and plates were invariably turned down in search of china marks.
(5) The fact that these early entrepreneurs built great industries out of very little made them seem to millions of Americans like the heroes of the early frontier days who went into the vast wildness of the United States and turned forests into farms, villages, and small cities.
(6) The strong influence of the success stories of the early entrepreneurs on the masses of Americans can be found in the great popularity of the novels of Horatio Alger, which were published in late nineteenth---and early twentieth---century America.
(7) In downtown Detroit there are some fine skyscrapers and expensive restaurants stores, and right on the edge of the downtown area, facing Canada across the busy Detroit River, is the waterfront, and its civic center, with parks and a concert hall, home of the famous Detroit Symphony Orchestra.
(8) TV stations, which will each spend millions to go digital, will use the specifications approved by the Federal Communications Commission to send the higher-quality TV signals to America's homes.
(9) The product is Coca-Cola and, according to legend, it begin in a three-legged kettle in the back yard of Atlanta pharmacist Dr. John Styth Pemberton who carried a jug of his concoctive down the street to Jacob's Pharmacy where it was sold at the soda foundation for 5 cents a glass.
(10) It is significant that Pemberton spent almost twice as much money on advertising during the first years of operation as he made in profits, for the growth of Coke's popularity is as much due to the advertising and marketing strategy as it is to the quality of its product.
Long and complex sentences almost consist of many sentence elements. These elements play different roles in the sentences. If the students can distinguish these elements, and recognize the functions of these elements in the sentences, they must use grammar to analyze the sentences. Then after a period of conscious training the students can understand the long and complex sentences and review the grammar. So the analytical ability and grammar knowledge are improved. Here are the explanations of the sentences above.
(1) Past participle and that-clause are used to modify “few places”. In that clause, that is the subject.
(2) “Until” is used to link the main clause and the objective clause. In the until---clause, there is an objective sentence (that they will... or service).
(3) “Be aware” is followed by a long objective clause (there were...their neighbors). The clause is complex. In the “ there be” structure, there are two objectives: a number of people and more people. The two objects are modified by two “who...” clauses.
(4) This sentence is composed of two simple sentences. The first simple sentence is more complex than the second one. The subject (the women) is much more complex. But there are hyphens, which is used to explain the subject. Two present participles (jostling around his stall and picking over his shoddy wares) are also used to explain the subject. And there are two verbs: would run or hold.
(5) Although this sentence is long, the main structure is easy (The fact made them seem to millions of Americans like the heroes.). The subject ( the fact ) has an apposition ( that these early entrepreneurs built great industries out of very little). “That” is only a signal word. The heroes, the object of the preposition like, has an attributive clause “who... and small cities”.
(6) In the subject, “the influence” is used with “on”, which makes the subject longer. “Which” clause is an non-restrictive clause.
(7) This sentence is composed of two parts. The first part is “there be” structure. The second part is an inversion sentence. Prepositional phrases “right on the edge of the downtown area” is put at the beginning of the sentence. The present participle “facing...” modifies “area”.
(8) The subject “TV stations” has a non-restrictive sentence (which.... go digital). The past participles (approved by... to America's homes) are used to modify “the specifications”. There are two “to” infinitive structures. The first “ to” is to express purpose. The second “ to” is used with “send”.
(9) “Dr. John Styth Pemberton” is an apposition to “pharmacist”. The attributive clause “Who...for 5 cents a glass” is used to modify “Dr. John Smith Pemberton”. Who---clause has an adverb clause of place (Where...), used to modify “Jacob's Pharmacy”.
(10) “It is significant that...” is an emphasis pattern. In that---clause, “for...” is used to express reason. In this part there are two same structures “as much... as...”.
By studying these sentences, the students can come across various sentence patterns and use various grammars to analyze the sentences. If the students themselves could analyze these sentences, they would fully and clearly understand the sentence structures and review various grammars. Not all the grammars can be explained in this way. But in such a way, the students can generally realize the importance of grammar knowledge in analyzing the sentences. They begin to learn how to cope with long and complex sentences and have a clear idea of the sentence structures.
3.4.2 Dealing With Vocabulary
Learning new words is a long and hard task with English study. Forgetting some of the learned new words is natural so the students should review these words over and over. Without patience, learning would not last longer. Without a certain amount of vocabulary, the students cannot continue reading study.
If the majority of words are unknown to the students, they will soon lose interest in reading. However, a few unknown words---say, five---in a short text of about 300 words should be acceptable (Gerry Abbott & Peter Wingard, 1990: 95). Less than 3% of unknown words in the reading material are also permitted by the syllabus.
Then how to deal with these unknown words?
The easiest way is to omit them. Just do not get the meaning of the unknown words, if they are unimportant for the reading purpose and such words do not influence the understanding of the material. The students can deliberately exclude any preliminary vocabulary work.
Sometimes it is not essential to know the meaning of the unknown word. An unknown noun can often be read as “a thing or a person”. The students could be encouraged to use this strategy as a first step, which may be sufficient for some reading purposes.
However, meanings of unknown words as key words are crucial to the understanding of the material. The students have to guess the meanings as correctly as possible. By the usual means of illustrations, demonstrations, synonyms and definitions, etc, the author can help remove much of the uncertainty and frustration the students feel when meeting new words in the reading materials.
Generally speaking, the most useful method is to use word-formation devices. The prefix, the root, and the suffix can be introduced. The author can choose the prefix, the root and the suffix which often appear in the new words and which are easy to understand. At least they can help the students to decipher something. The students soon show great interest in learning new words. This method is effective for the students to enlarge their vocabulary.
All the meanings of unknown words should be decided in the context. The meanings cannot be separated from the reading material, especially if there are several explanations. The students have to choose the appropriate meaning according to the context, e.g. looking for clues in the rest of the sentences, so that an intelligent guess is likely to be correct.
When explaining new words and expressions, the author sometimes classifies them into nouns, verbs, and adjectives, explains them one by one and writes the usage on the blackboard as the students require. Sometimes the author asks the students to combine them into a phrase by using a noun, a verb and an adjective. Sometimes the author asks the students to introduce to other students how they remember new words.
The author consciously collects others’ related papers, copies them and introduces them to the students. These articles benefit them and the students can form their own methods to enlarge their vocabulary.
At the same time the author tries to resist the temptation to explain every new word. The students should be encouraged to learn to cope with passages which include lexical items and grammar structures that they have not met. Students must realize that they can enjoy a material without the help of a dictionary or a teacher. If they persist in reading a lot, the students’ reading will gradually become more fluent and the difficulties will diminish.
3.4.3 Improving Reading Speed
What causes the students slow reading? The students themselves do not mention the reasons. They are only anxious to improve reading speed. Slow readers are the product of the habit. They often mouth the words one by one as they read and try to make sense of each word. They focus their attention on each particular word. The author asks the students to read in a sense group.
The author does not allow too much time for reading sometimes. The students are constantly urged towards greater reading speed, bearing in mind the purpose of the reading. Different purposes affect reading speed. Many years’ practices of reading without a purpose result in reading everything in the same way and at the same speed. The normal procedure is that the students are required to read a passage and then answer the questions that follow. Their reading is usually purposeless because they have not read the questions first, and have no idea of what they will be asked. They try to get all the information, some of which could be irrelevant. No wonder a uniform slow pace develops. Pre-reading questions can be useful because they focus students’ attention on the types of information that they are about to read.
Different reading purposes demand different speeds. A clear reading purpose decides the proper speed needed to accomplish that purpose. The author tries to provide the students with as many reading opportunities as possible, including various types of reading (fast, slow, skimming, scanning, studying). The aim is to encourage autoimmunization of recognizing common words or word-combinations, which is crucial to reading speed. The students can learn to control and adopt their reading speed according to different reading materials and different reading purposes.
Some unknown words prevent the students from reading quickly. The students should be told it is not necessary to get the meaning of every new word. The dictionary is often over-used, resulting in slower and less fluent reading, as well as frequent misunderstanding through the selection of the wrong definition. The students should know how to use the dictionary, but they should also learn where it is necessary and when an intelligent guess is preferable. On the whole, the dictionary is best used as a means to confirm or disprove a preliminary guess of their own, based on the understanding of the context.
3.4.4 Employing Different Reading Skills for Different Types of Reading Materials
Although only two students ask to improve reading skills in their self-comments, the author thinks they should be introduced to the students because reading skills can help improve reading speed and obtain main information.
The students read different materials for various reasons. They read a novel for pleasure, read a railway schedule or a newspaper for information, read a scholarly journal or book for knowledge, read a guidebook for curiosity, read instructions for a new machine to satisfy the need. The purpose in real reading is not to scrutinize every word or analyze the syntax. The students should adopt appropriate reading skills depending on the purposes and the reading materials.
Scanning, skimming, intensive reading, extensive reading are commonly used in reading. The teachers can assign different tasks by asking the students to use these four skills. They are basic skill requirements for the students and are helpful to the improvement of reading ability. The aim is to adopt these skills flexibly in different reading materials.
By skimming, the students run the eyes quickly over the reading materials to get the main idea or the gist. By scanning, the students are to look for a particular item or items in the reading materials. Again it is fairly fast reading with instant rejection of all irrelevant data, perhaps most of the reading material. The two skills are quite widely practiced in the reading and useful for the students to operate. Skilled students scan to locate specific information in reading materials and skim to extract general information from what they read or to discover what the material is about. Intensive reading, also called study reading, involves close study of the materials.
The transferability of principled flexible skills to different types of reading materials is one of the most effective things to develop in reading. Different reading purposes can decide what skills would be chosen.
Scanning
Scanning is not used in reading the entire text. After a period of training, the students can use it automatically. The following tasks can be used in teaching:
Find new words for old ones This is a good way to focus upon a new word or useful phrase. Tell the students to find anonyms or antonyms, giving the clues in words that they already know. For example the teachers can ask them to find a word which means dirty (filthy), to find a phrase which has the opposite meaning of she was interested (she was bored).
Locate grammar features Make a list of specified grammar features, such as all the irregular past tense verbs, the prepositions of place, the conjunctions, verb forms ending in ---ing.
Find a specified advertisement Find an item specified on a whole page of advertisements, or the time of a specific radio programmer or TV shows in the entertainments page of a newspaper or programmer guide.
Compare details Check a set of brochure cuttings to find which airlines offer midweek flights from, e.g. London to Rome.
Check dates Using a short biography or obituary notice, ask the class to identify a person's date and place of birth. Alternatively, the students can calculate their age at entry to a profession, or their age today( if still alive ) or at death.
Shopping lists List all the vegetables available in the different parts of a menu or find the cheapest dry white wine in the brochure of a wine merchant. With a long shopping list, note all the products that would be bought in a specific shop.
Make word sets List specified sets of words (those beginning with a prefix, adjectives, collective nouns, topic vocabulary, etc).
Newspaper headlines Cram a selection of newspaper headlines onto a worksheet and ask the students to find the one (or more ) that treats a specified topic.
Skimming tasks
Unlike scanning, skimming involves reading, but it is done at a fast speed. Most of these tasks can usually be given orally. The students can be asked to do any of the following tasks:
Compare values Find the best value saucepan, washing machine, divan bed, or whatever the teachers to choose, from a set of similar advertisements for the product.
Find and compare events From an obituary of biography, decide the major achievement of a person's life.
Select a title Choose the most appropriate title for a passage from a multiple-choice array on the same page or on a separate worksheet or poster.
Draw inferences Draw inferences about the writer's attitude to a situation or topic.
Decide the question Decide what question the writer set out to answer.
Create a title Compose an alternative title or subtitle for the text or for each paragraph.
Intensive reading tasks
This involves the class in the close reading of a passage, normally a fairly short one. Students can be asked to perform tasks as follows:
Match nouns and verbs Circle all the subject nouns or noun phrases and indicate the verb that goes with each one.
Split sentences Put a slash between the two or more parts of a longer sentence to show where it could be broken down into shorter sentences. List the words that would be removed in the process.
Combine sentences Indicate where shorter sentences could be combined, suggesting the connecting words (link words) that might be used.
Make summaries Produce a summarizing sentence for each paragraph.
Reorder sentences Read a jigsaw sentence paragraph and decide the order of the sentences in the original.
Reorder paragraphs Read a longer passage where the paragraphs have been jumbled and reorder them.
Fill the gaps Read a gapped passage and provide suitable words for each gap.
Complete tables and graphs Read an article and list the events. Complete a table or a graph to present any data visually.
Take sides List arguments for and against a proposition, those that are given in the passage and those that the students themselves might like to make.
Read and choose Chose among multiple-choice stimuli. These can be at the level of vocabulary, comprehension of detail or inference.
Select a summary Choose the best of several summaries of a passage, but with slightly different emphases.
Compare versions Compare two newspaper reports of the same incident. The students should make lists of points that are reported in both articles and those that are listed in only one, identifying any factual differences.
Identify facts Read an article or report and separate facts from opinions.
Focus on form and style List all examples of specified grammatical points in the text, such as use of the passive voice, indirect speech, the past perfect simple tense, etc.
Extensive reading tasks
This is often associated with supplementary reading books read outside the classroom. Its main value is to foster fluency. This type of reading is usually a very private matter, teacher-free and below frustration level in difficulty. It is desirable for students to aim at a fairly good speed.
This implies a supply of long reading materials that students can take away to read in their leisure time. It also implies a measure of freedom and noninterference from the teachers, so there should be little follow-up. The aim is to read for enjoyment. Even so, the teachers have to show interest and allow the students to offer some form of feedback. The teachers can ask them to do some of the following:
Keep records Just the routine of keeping records of what they have read is motivating and can encourage students to read more, especially if the teachers commend avid students from time to time. Let them keep a little booklet, with the names of the writers, the titles and the date on which they read each book. An alternative procedure is for the teachers to keep a class record, checking the student's reaction when a book is returned.
Wall chart Some teachers put a poster on the wall, listing the books available. The students are allowed to initial the titles of the books they have read and award a mark out of ten for each one. This mark is for its interest. A succession of high marks encourages other students to take the book home.
Make summaries The students can be asked to write a short summary of each charter of the book as a whole. This report can be done in their record books or their exercise books.
Indicate the difficulty Stick a slip of paper in the front of each book. Ask the students to award a grade (A, B, C, or D) for the level of difficulty and to initial their awareness. An A grade indicates that they find it easy; a D shows that it was difficult. Again, a succession of A's and B's encourages others to borrow the book (although the teachers must ensure that it is not too simple for this class). A succession of D's tells the teachers that this book really belongs in the book box for the class above.
Through these exercises, the students can fully understand the reading materials. If these skills are improved, reading comprehension can be improved in general. Improvements of reading comprehension are affected by many factors. The syllabus lists some factors and the students have strong needs for these factors. Here are some of them.
---to understand the main idea of the passage
---to understand the concrete information
---to guess the meaning of the new words by reference according to the context
---to make a simple judgment and reference according to the context
---to identify the writer's writing purpose, viewpoint and attitude
---to make a conclusion to the reading material
---to scan related information quickly
3.4.5 Improving Comprehension Skills
During reading teaching, the students are often required to consider these questions. By doing so, the students can improve their reading ability. How to succeed in improving comprehension skills? The students must be trained. The teachers should explain them one by one in the whole reading teaching.
(1) Identify the main idea
(2) Recognize and recall specific details and facts
(3) Recognize the relationship between the main ideas and their expansion (examples, etc,) with the help of signal words
(4) Follow the sequence, e.g. events, instructions, stages of an argument
(5) Anticipate the form and the content
(6) Infer from the text (read between the lines)
(7) Draw a conclusion
(8) Recognize the writer's purpose and attitude
Main idea
The main idea is the essence of a piece of writing, or what the writer is trying to get across to the students. If the students were to discard the main idea, the remaining sentences would be practically meaningless.
Some paragraphs contain a topic sentence that tells the students the exact main idea. This topic sentence would include who or what the paragraph is about (the topic) and what the writer wants the students to understand about the topic. This topic sentence would be the stated main idea.
A stated main idea is often found in the first sentence in a paragraph, and is followed by supporting details. But this is not always the case. Some writers prefer to give the supporting details first and to end with the main idea. Others give some details, the main idea, and then more details.
In some paragraphs, all the information is equally important and the students must summarize the entire paragraph in order to get the main idea. On the other hand, there are paragraphs which do not directly state the main idea but which require the students to infer the meaning based on the information given. Therefore, the students get the implied main idea by “reading between the lines.” Because it could be found anywhere in the paragraph and could be stated or implied, the students should have the ability to find the main idea. This could be done by asking the following questions after the students read a paragraph could help the students get the main idea:
(1) What is the topic of the paragraph? The topic of the paragraph is who or what the paragraph is about---the subject being discussed, for example, the topic could be onions.
(2) What aspect of the topic is the writer discussing? Most topics are broken down into small aspects. For example, if the subject is onions, the writer might discuss how they are grown, how they are marketed, the varieties of onions, unique ways to cook them, how to chop them without crying, or even the beauty of their layered construction. When the students determine the aspect of the subject that the writer is discussing, the students are ready to ask the third question, which will give the students the main idea, whether it is stated or implied.
(3) What main idea does the writer want the students to know about the topic in relation to the aspect being discussed? If the writer’s topic is onions, and the aspect is chopping onions without tears, then he might want the students to know that chopping a chilled onion submerged in water can prevent eye irritation---thus no tears.
Details
The main idea is the most important idea the writer intends. But in order to gain a complete understanding, this main idea may need to be defined, explained, proved, or analyzed. In other words, the writer uses details to fill in this important information. Some of these details directly support the main idea and are essential to understanding the idea. These are the major details in the passage. Writers use minor details to indirectly support the main idea. Although these details make the reading more interesting and they relate to the main idea, it is not essential to remember them to comprehend the passage. Without major details, the meaning might not be clear because basic information could not been included. Without minor details, the material might not be as readable but would be just as understandable.
It is important to distinguish major details from minor details.
When deciding whether a detail is major or minor, the students should determine the purpose and need for the information as well as the main idea that the writer wants the students to understand.
The main idea and major supporting details are often all that the students need for a clear and complete understanding of a reading passage. However, there are times when both the major and the minor details would be very important. For example, if a student learned that he had a certain illness, he would be more likely to want to read detailed information about it and would be interested in every detail.
Signal words
Signal words are like traffic lights or road signs. They warn the students of abrupt changes in direction, and guide the students smoothly along the path of thought set down by the writer. They can be a valuable aid in anticipating what is coming next; they can also help to identify the pattern the writer is using to get the point across. Signal words may be found anywhere in a paragraph or may be used to provide a smooth transition from one paragraph to the next.
Some commonly used signal words are grouped and explained.
(1) Signal a contrast or reversal of thought: although, but, however, on the other hand, nevertheless, on the contrary, instead, yet, unlike, conversely. When one of these words or phrases is found in a sentence, it is a signal that there is a change of the thought. The writer may be comparing or contrasting or may simply be reversing the direction of thought. In other words, the writer is presenting two or more sides of a situation.
(2) Signal additional information: also, in addition, furthermore, and, likewise, moreover, besides, another. The words or phrases signal that more of the same kind of information is to be added to what the students just read.
(3) Signal reasoning and explanation: because, the reason for, in order that. Information is easier to understand and remember when the writer gives reasons for the information of especially difficult material. The additional information helps to make difficult words easier to understand by providing an explanation.
(4) Signal an example or illustration: for example, for instance, in other words, such as. Most of the students understand ideas much better, whether simple or complex, if an example or an illustration is given, therefore, when an idea or a concept is difficult and the students see one of these signal words, the students should take note and benefit from the example relationship.
(5) Signal enumeration, such as time order, sequence or listing: one, two, three; first, second, third; next; then; finally; time of day; dates (day, month, year). These signal words indicate that it would be helpful for the students to understand the time order or sequence in which something did or should take place or that there is more than one factor to consider. Usually information that is presented in some kind of order is easier to understand.
(6) Signal a summary or conclusion: therefore, consequently, thus, in summary, in conclusion, in short. Often, at the end of a paragraph, a passage, or a chapter, the author will signal the students that a summary or conclusion will be forthcoming.
Organizational patterns
The main idea is what the writer wants the students to understand about the topic being discussed. The main idea is supported by details, both major and minor, that help the students understand the topic. The writer uses a variety of patterns to relate the supporting details to the main idea. Some of these patterns are explanations, examples, comparisons and contrasts, causes and ef